Thursday, June 30, 2005

None dare call it treason

"For those of you who do, as a matter of principle, oppose war in any form, the idea of supporting a conscientious objector who's already been inducted in his combat service in Iraq might have a certain appeal. But let me ask you this: Would you render the same level of support to someone who hadn't conscientiously objected, but rather instead rolled a grenade under their line officer in order to neutralize the combat capacity of their unit?"

"...Conscientious objection removes a given piece of cannon fodder from the fray. Fragging an officer has a much more impactful effect."
Ward Churchill, Portland, Oregon- 6/23/05
I dare to call this treason.

Linked to other fans of Ward Churchill: Michelle Malkin, Red State Rant, Conservative Outpost, Decision '08, Dean Esmay, Blackfive, Blogotional, Murdoc Online, Technicalities, Daly Thoughts, The Chief Brief, Right in Texas, Trey Jackson with the video of speech, Les Enfants Terrible, ROFASix (nice squirrel, called an ardillo down here), The New Editor, Teen Patriot, California Conservative, Lifelike Pundits, The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler (nice doggie), Villainous Company - heap big stupid, Ed Driscoll, Ed Driscoll - more, The Jawa Report, Demosophia, Anticipatory Retaliation, A Mentsh Trakht "Fake Indian with masters degree" - I answer your question, Modern Crusader, Marc Cooper, Armed Victim, The Penguin Proletariat - on the warpath, Coalition of the Swilling - for extra credit, The Recovering Democrat, She Who Will Be Obeyed, The Eclectic Econoclast - don't invite this guy back,

No comments: